Hepatic MR imaging: comparison of 2D and 3D gradient echo techniques

Citation
Mj. Kim et al., Hepatic MR imaging: comparison of 2D and 3D gradient echo techniques, ABDOM IMAG, 26(3), 2001, pp. 269-276
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging
Journal title
ABDOMINAL IMAGING
ISSN journal
09428925 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
269 - 276
Database
ISI
SICI code
0942-8925(200105/06)26:3<269:HMICO2>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Background: To compare fat-suppressed three-dimensional gradient echo (3D-G RE) and two-dimensional gradient echo (2D-GRE) techniques for hepatic magne tic resonance imaging. Methods: For 107 patients with suspected focal hepatic lesions, unenhanced 2D-GRE multislice in-phase and opposed-phase images and 3D-GRE images were obtained. Two radiologists independently and in random order reviewed the i mages. Quantitative analysis compared contrast-to-noise ratio (C/N) of live r masses and of the liver to spleen and signal-to-noise ratio (S/N) of the liver. Subjective grading of lesion conspicuity, confidence for lesion dete ction, artifacts, and overall image quality were also evaluated. Results: Conspicuity and confidence for focal lesions was statistically sig nificantly higher on 3D-GRE than on 2D-GRE images, Liver-to-spleen C/N was higher on 3D-GRE images than on in-phase and opposed-phase 2D-GRE images (p < 0.01). Liver S/N was higher on in-phase 2D-GRE images than on 3D-GRE and opposed-phase 2D-GRE images (p < 0.001). Lesion-to-liver C/N was higher on 3D-GRE images than on 2D-GRE images for nonsolid lesions (p < 0.05), but t here was no significant difference for solid lesions. Motion and pulsation artifacts were significantly fewer on 3D-GRE images, but graininess and sha ding were significantly higher. Overall image quality was not significantly different for the three sequences. Conclusion: Fat-suppressed 3D-GRE sequences can afford comparable or better image quality than 2D-GRE images and may have the potential to detect more focal hepatic lesions.