QT intervals and QT dispersion as measures of left ventricular hypertrophyin an unselected hypertensive population

Citation
N. Chapman et al., QT intervals and QT dispersion as measures of left ventricular hypertrophyin an unselected hypertensive population, AM J HYPERT, 14(5), 2001, pp. 455-462
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION
ISSN journal
08957061 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Part
1
Pages
455 - 462
Database
ISI
SICI code
0895-7061(200105)14:5<455:QIAQDA>2.0.ZU;2-6
Abstract
Electrocardiographic (ECG) QT intervals and dispersion correlate with echoc ardiographic left ventricular mass index (LVMI) in groups of selected essen tial hypertensives. We tested the strength of this relationship in a large group of unselected hypertensives to assess whether QT measurements may be a simple screening test for LVH in clinical practice. In a cross-sectional study of 386 un selected hypertensive subjects, maximal QT intervals (QT(ma x)), QT dispersion (QT(disp)), and ECG voltages (Sokolow-Lyon and Cornell s ex-specific voltages) were measured from 12-lead EGG. The LVMI correlated m ost strongly with Cornell voltage (linear regression r = 0.44, P < .001). T he strongest relationship between LVMI and VT parameters was with QT(max), (r = 0,25, P < .001), This relationship weakened using heart rate-corrected QT(max). Correlations between LVMI and QT(disp) were weak, whether or not they were corrected for heart rate. Sokolow-Lyon voltages, Cornell voltage and QT(max), but not QT(disp), were independently predictive of LVMI after adjustment for age, sex, race, and the other ECG parameters. Receiver opera ting characteristic (ROC) curve analyses demonstrated that no QT parameter performed better than simple ECG voltage criteria in the detection of LVH. In conclusion, QT(max), the QT parameter most strongly associated with LVMI , was independently associated with LVMI after adjustment for standard ECG voltage criteria. However, as an isolated measure it was no better than sim ple ECG voltage criteria as a screening test for LVH in clinical practice. (C) 2001 American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd.