Somatic and visceral symptoms have a surprisingly weak relationship to obje
ctive measures of tissue pathology. This is exemplified by the poor correla
tion found between palpitations and cardiac arrhythmias. Many factors other
than extent of disease influence symptomatic distress, and since symptoms
are such a crucial feature of illness and of medical practice, much more in
vestigation of these nonbiomedical influences is needed. Although experimen
tal laboratory paradigms facilitate such investigation, there are problems
involved in generalizing from laboratory findings to the reporting of the s
ymptoms of disease in daily life. In studying the awareness of cardiac arrh
ythmias and of resting heartbeat, we have found that the palpitations of pa
tients who somatize more and have more health-related anxiety and more psyc
hiatric distress are significantly less likely to be related to demonstrabl
e cardiac arrhythmias than are the palpitations of other patients. The accu
rate awareness of arrhythmias, however, is not associated with the accurate
awareness of resting heartbeat. Even more surprising, a relatively large p
roportion of heart transplant recipients are accurately aware of their rest
ing heartbeat. This work poses more questions than it answers. In so doing,
it underscores some of the technical difficulties of conducting research i
n this area and shows how little is known about symptom perception, process
ing, and reporting.