Symptom management in older primary care patients: Feasibility of an experimental, written self-disclosure protocol

Citation
Jc. Klapow et al., Symptom management in older primary care patients: Feasibility of an experimental, written self-disclosure protocol, ANN INT MED, 134(9), 2001, pp. 905-911
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Journal title
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
ISSN journal
00034819 → ACNP
Volume
134
Issue
9
Year of publication
2001
Part
2
Supplement
S
Pages
905 - 911
Database
ISI
SICI code
0003-4819(20010501)134:9<905:SMIOPC>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Background: Distress-driven symptoms are prevalent among older primary care patients and account for a large percentage of office visits and increased medical costs, An experimental written self-disclosure protocol has been s hown to reduce symptoms and use of health care services in healthy adults. Written self-disclosure as a method for reducing symptoms has not been eval uated in the primary care setting, Objective: To evaluate the feasibility of adapting an experimental written self-disclosure protocol for the primary care setting. Design: Randomized, single-blind feasibility study. Setting: University-based geriatric and internal medicine primary care clin ics. Patients: 45 patients 66 years of age or older without a psychiatric diagno sis, Intervention: Three 20-minute writing sessions focusing on distressing expe riences (in the intervention group) or health behaviors (in the control gro up). Measurements: The feasibility outcomes were patient recruitment, proto col logistics, and patient and provider satisfaction. The clinical outcomes were somatic and distress symptoms, health care utilization, and associate d costs. Results: one third of patients screened were recruited; 96% of patients rec ruited completed the protocol, Clinic contact time was an average of 55 min utes per patient. Patients and providers reported high levels of satisfacti on with the protocol. Reductions in symptoms were minimal for both groups. Use of outpatient services and associated costs decreased in both groups, b ut the reduction was twice as great in the treatment group as in the contro l group. Conclusions: Findings support the feasibility of implementing the protocol as a primary care intervention.