Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis

Citation
Sl. Lee et al., Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis, ARCH SURG, 136(5), 2001, pp. 556-561
Citations number
15
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY
ISSN journal
00040010 → ACNP
Volume
136
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
556 - 561
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-0010(200105)136:5<556:CTAUDN>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Hypothesis: Computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography (US) do not improv e the overall diagnostic accuracy for acute appendicitis. Design: Retrospective review. Setting: University tertiary care center. Patients: Seven hundred sixty-six consecutive patients undergoing appendect omy for suspected appendicitis from January 1, 1995, to December 31, 1999. Main Outcome Measures: Epidemiology of acute appendicitis and the roles of clinical assessment, CT, US, and laparoscopy. Results: The negative appendectomy rate was 15.7%, and the incidence of per forated appendicitis was 14.6%. A history of migratory pain had the highest positive predictive value (91%), followed by leukocytosis greater than 12x 10 degrees /L (90.1%), CT (83.8%), and US (81.3%). The false-negative rates were 60% for CT and 76.1% for US. Emergency department evaluation took a m ean +/- SD of 5.2 +/-5.4 hours and was prolonged by US or CT (6.4 +/- 74 h and 7.8 +/- 10.8 h, respectively). The duration of emergency department eva luation did not affect the perforation rate, but patients with postoperativ e complications had longer evaluations (mean +/- SD, 8.0 +/- 12.7 h) than d id those without (4.8 +/-3.3 h) (P=.04). Morbidity was 9.1%, 6.4% for nonpe rforated cases and 19.8% for perforated cases. Seventy-six patients had lap aroscopic appendectomy, with a negative appendectomy rate of 42.1%, compare d with 15.4% for open appendectomy (P < .001). Laparoscopy, however, had mi nimal morbidity (1.3%) and correctly identified the abnormality in 91.6% of patients who had a normal-appearing appendix. Conclusions: Migratory pain, physical examination, and initial leukocytosis remain reliable and accurate in diagnosing acute appendicitis. Neither CT nor US improves the diagnostic accuracy or the negative appendectomy rate; in fact, they may delay surgical consultation and appendectomy. In atypical cases, one should consider the selective use of diagnostic laparoscopy ins tead.