Comparative pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability after subcutaneous administration of recombinant human erythropoietin formulated with different stabilizers

Citation
Wk. Cheung et al., Comparative pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability after subcutaneous administration of recombinant human erythropoietin formulated with different stabilizers, BIOPHARM DR, 21(6), 2000, pp. 211-219
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
BIOPHARMACEUTICS & DRUG DISPOSITION
ISSN journal
01422782 → ACNP
Volume
21
Issue
6
Year of publication
2000
Pages
211 - 219
Database
ISI
SICI code
0142-2782(200009)21:6<211:CPSATA>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
This report summarizes the results of two double-blind, single-center, rand omized studies that used a two-period crossover design. The objective of th ese two studies was to compare the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pain score at the subcutaneous (sc) injection site of a phosphate-buffe red recombinant human erythropoietin (EPREX (R), epoetin alfa, r-HuEPO) for mulated with a new stabilizer (glycine and Polysorbate 80) with the commerc ially available EPREX (R) formulations, which uses human serum albumin (HSA ) as the stabilizer. Twenty-four healthy male volunteers were enrolled in e ach of the two studies. In the first study, subjects received a single 150 IU/kg sc dose of r-HuEPO using the 2000 IU/mL (2K) phosphate-buffered formu lation with or without the new stabilizer (12 subjects/group). In the secon d study, subjects received a single 750 IU/kg sc dose of r-HuEPO using the 40000 IU/mL (40K) phosphate-buffered formulation with or without the new st abilizer (12 subjects; group). in each study, r-HuEPO was administered over two separate dosing periods, each separated with a 28-day washout period. There were no significant differences in AUC and C-max for either strength of r-HuEPO formulated with or without the new stabilizer, indicating that t he absorption and disposition characteristics of the two formulations were similar after sc administration. Both r-HuEPO strengths with and without th e new stabilizer were safe and well tolerated; the safety and tolerability profiles of both formulations for each r-HuEPO concentration were comparabl e. There were no statistically significant differences in pain score for ei ther strength of r-HuEPO with and without the new stabilizer. It was conclu ded that the two phosphate-buffered r-HuEPO concentrations formulated with and without the new stabilizer are pharmacokinetically equivalent. Copyrigh t (C) 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.