Allogeneic stem cell transplantation reduces disease progression compared to autologous transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma

Citation
C. Reynolds et al., Allogeneic stem cell transplantation reduces disease progression compared to autologous transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma, BONE MAR TR, 27(8), 2001, pp. 801-807
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Hematology,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
ISSN journal
02683369 → ACNP
Volume
27
Issue
8
Year of publication
2001
Pages
801 - 807
Database
ISI
SICI code
0268-3369(200104)27:8<801:ASCTRD>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
This study compares the probability of disease progression, progression-fre e survival, and overall survival between patients undergoing an allogeneic or autologous transplant for multiple myeloma using an identical preparativ e regimen. Patients received a preparative regimen of TBI, busulfan, and cy clophosphamide followed by an allogeneic or autologous transplant. In the a llogeneic group (n = 21), six patients received bone marrow and 15 received G-CSF mobilized PBSC; all autologous patients (n = 35) received PBSC mobil ized with cyclophosphamide and G-CSF. Allogeneic donors were HLA-identical (n = 20) or one-antigen mismatched (n = 1) siblings. Graft-versus-host dise ase (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus (n = 10), tacrolimus/methotr exate (n = 6), cyclosporine/methotrexate (n = 4), or cyclosporine (n = 1). The groups were evenly matched for gender, pretransplant therapy, disease s tatus at time of transplant, myeloma subtype, and time from diagnosis to tr ansplant. The median age was significantly lower in the allogeneic group (4 8 vs 55 years, P < 0.01). In the allogeneic group the probabilities of deve loping acute GVHD grade II-IV and chronic GVHD were 55% and 82%, respective ly. The Kaplan-Meier probability of disease progression was significantly l ower in the allogeneic group (11% vs 64%, P < 0.001) compared to the autolo gous group. Although progression-free (60% vs 30%, P = 0.19) and overall su rvival at 2 years (60% vs 42%, P = 0.39) favored the allogeneic group, this did not reach statistical significance. Within the allogeneic transplant g roup, patients age 50 years or under had a 3-year overall survival signific antly higher when compared to older patients (79% vs 29%, P = 0.03). Using identical preparative regimens, allogeneic transplantation reduced disease progression compared to autologous transplantation for myeloma. This sugges ts that allogeneic transplantation induces a graft-versus-myeloma (GVM) eff ect.