Ca. Murray et al., An assessment of the incidence of punctures in latex and non-latex dental examination gloves in routine clinical practice, BR DENT J, 190(7), 2001, pp. 377-380
Objective To investigate the puncture resistance of a recently introduced n
on-latex, nitrile dental glove in comparison with a latex glove worn during
routine clinical dental procedures.
Setting Dentists in general dental practice working within the UK during 19
99. Subjects and methods 2,020 gloves worn by five general dental practitio
ners were examined for punctures following standard clinical use by a water
inflation method. Procedures undertaken during glove usage and length of t
ime worn were recorded.
Results Following clinical use, 1.9% of the latex gloves and 5.3% of the ni
trile gloves had punctures, a statistically significant difference (P < 0.0
001). The puncture resistance of the nitrile gloves was superior to the pun
cture resistance of previously tested worn non-latex (vinyl) gloves. There
was no evidence of a statistically significant difference between operators
for the percentage or incidence of punctured gloves (P = 0.787) after corr
ecting fbr glove type. No statistically significant difference was noted be
tween incidence of puncture in the control, unused gloves (n = 200 for each
type) and the gloves examined following clinical use (P = 0.907 for nitril
e, P = 0.613 for later).
Conclusion No increase in the number of punctures was noted following clini
cal use for either glove type. This could be considered to indicate good pu
ncture resistance of the gloves tested in clinical use.