IQ heritability, the portion of a population's IQ variability attribut
able to the effects of genes', has been investigated for nearly a cent
ury, yet it remains controversial. Covariance between relatives may be
due not only to genes, but also to shared environments, and most prev
ious models have assumed different degrees of similarity induced by en
vironments specific to twins, to non-twin siblings (henceforth sibling
s), and to parents and offspring. We now evaluate an alternative model
that replaces these three environments by two maternal womb environme
nts, one for twins and another for siblings, along with a common home
environment. Meta-analysis of 212 previous studies shows that our 'mat
ernal-effects' model fits the data better than the 'family-environment
s' model. Maternal effects, often assumed to be negligible, account fo
r 20% of covariance between twins and 5% between siblings, and the eff
ects of genes are correspondingly reduced, with two measures of herita
bility being less than 50%. The shared maternal environment may explai
n the striking correlation between the IQs of twins, especially those
of adult twins that were reared apart. IQ heritability increases durin
g early childhood, but whether it stabilizes thereafter remains unclea
r. A recent study of octogenarians(2), for instance, suggests that IQ
heritability either remains constant through adolescence and adulthood
(3), or continues to increase with age(2). Although the latter hypothe
sis has recently been endorsed(4), it gathers only modest statistical
support in our analysis when compared to the maternal-effects hypothes
is. Our analysis suggests that it will be important to understand the
basis for these maternal effects if ways in which IQ might be increase
d are to be identified.