D. Kee et W. Karwowski, The boundaries for joint angles of isocomfort for sitting and standing males based on perceived comfort of static joint postures, ERGONOMICS, 44(6), 2001, pp. 614-648
This study presents data for the joint angles of isocomfort (JAI) in sittin
g and standing males based on perceived comfort ratings for static joint po
stures maintained for 60 s. The JAI value was defined as a boundary indicat
ing joint deviation (an angle) from neutral posture, within which the perce
ived comfort for different body joint postures is expected to be the same.
An experiment for quantifying perceived comfort ratings was conducted using
the free modulus method of magnitude estimation. Based on experimental res
ults, regression equations were derived for each joint posture, to represen
t the relationships between different levels of joint deviation/joint postu
re and corresponding normalized comfort scores. The JAI values were develop
ed for nine verbal categories of joint comfort. The JAIs with the marginal
comfort levels, one of the nine verbal categories used, for most joint post
ures around the wrist, elbow, neck and ankle were similar to the maximum ra
nge of motion (ROM) values for these joints. However, the JAIs with the mar
ginal comfort category for back and hip postures were much smaller than the
maximum ROM values for these joints. There were no significant differences
in JAI expressed in terms of the percentage of the corresponding maximum R
OM values between sitting and standing postures. The relative 'marginal com
fort index', defined as the percentage of JAIs for the marginal comfort rel
ative to the corresponding maximum ROM values, for the hip was the smallest
among all joints. This was followed, in an increasing order of the margina
l comfort index, by the lower back and shoulder, while the marginal comfort
index for the elbow joint was the largest. The results of this study sugge
st that static postures maintained for 60 s cause greater discomfort for th
e hip joint than for the other joints studied, and less discomfort for the
elbow than for the other joints. The data about JAIs can be used as guideli
nes for enhancing postural comfort when designing a variety of human-machin
e tasks where static postures cannot be eliminated.