Analyzing patient participation in medical encounters

Citation
Rl. Street et B. Millay, Analyzing patient participation in medical encounters, HEALTH COM, 13(1), 2001, pp. 61-73
Citations number
31
Categorie Soggetti
Public Health & Health Care Science
Journal title
HEALTH COMMUNICATION
ISSN journal
10410236 → ACNP
Volume
13
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
61 - 73
Database
ISI
SICI code
1041-0236(2001)13:1<61:APPIME>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
An essential component of the delivery of health care is the consultation b etween the patient and health care provider. Participation in the medical c onsultation is fundamentally a communicative event in which clinicians and patients use talk to exchange information, to share their expertise and poi nts of view, to build a trusting relationship, and to make health-related d ecisions. A growing body of evidence indicates that patients who more activ ely participate in these encounters are more satisfied with their health ca re, receive more patient-centered care (e.g., information, support) from pr oviders, are more committed to treatment regimens, have a stronger sense of control over health, and even experience better health following the visit than do more passive patients (for reviews, see Kaplan, Greenfield, & Ware , 1989; Roter & Hall, 1993; Street, 2001). Because patient involvement is a n important part of the health care process, it is imperative that investig ators analyze the phenomenon using reliable and valid measures that have a solid conceptual foundation. In this article, we have three objectives. First, we describe the conceptua l foundation and measurement strategies used in our approach to analyzing t he communicative acts that constitute patient participation in medical enco unters. Second, we apply our method to an analysis of nine videotaped recor dings of physician-patient interactions. Two research questions (RQs) will be examined: (a) To what extent do patients ask questions, express concerns , and engage in assertive behavior in their interactions with physicians? a nd (b) Are patients more active communicators when their physicians use par tnership building (e.g., soliciting the patient's opinion) and supportive t alk (e.g., reassurance, encouragement)? Finally, we conclude with a discuss ion of challenges and prospects for developing more ecologically valid and efficient procedures for assessing patient participation in care.