J. Schachter et al., EVALUATION OF THE VIDAS CHLAMYDIA TEST TO DETECT AND VERIFY CHLAMYDIA-TRACHOMATIS IN UROGENITAL SPECIMENS, Journal of clinical microbiology, 35(8), 1997, pp. 2102-2106
The Vidas Chlamydia test (CHL) is an automated enzyme-linked immunoflu
orescence assay for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. Positive a
nd equivocal results are confined with a blocking assay, A mouse monoc
lonal antibody directed against the chlamydial lipopolysaccharides via
s used for the test, Thee CHL assay is widely used in Europe, but U.S.
experience with it is limited. Three clinical test sites (The Arlingt
on Hospital, Arlington, Va., Indiana University, Indianapolis, and the
University of California, San Francisco) compared CHL with tissue cul
ture (TC) for the identification of chlamydia in urogenital specimens
(2,453 females and 850 males), True positives (TP) were defined as eit
her TC positive or TC negative and CHL positive by a positive direct f
luorescent-antibody assay or PCR test. Overall prevalence was 5.5% for
females, 10.3% for male urethral swabs, and 10.7% for combined male T
C urethral swabs and CHL with first catch urine (FCU) specimens, Compa
red to TP, CHL and TC had sensitivities of 89.6 and 94.1% with female
cervical, swabs and 90.9 and 86.4% with male urethral swabs, respectiv
ely, CHL sensitivity was 81.2 for male FCU specimens and 77.7% for mat
ching male TC swabs. There were relatively few false-positive results,
with all specificities being >99.4%, With the blocking assay, Vidas C
HL specificity was >99.7%. However, male FCU specimen sensitivity was
compromised because 9.2% (7 of 76) of the TP were initially positive b
ut were not confirmed, An improvement in the Vidas blocking assay is n
eeded before we can recommend its use with male urine, Alternatively,
one could argue that the specificity of the Lest is so high that a con
firmatory assay is not needed,For male and female swabs, the Vidas CHL
assay has a performance that is similar to that of TC.