Jc. Parodi et al., Neutrophil respiratory burst activity and pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines in AAA surgery: Conventional versus endoluminal treatment, J ENDOVAS T, 8(2), 2001, pp. 114-124
Purpose: To examine the inflammatory impact of endovascular and conventiona
l surgery of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) as assessed by the activation
of neutrophils and serum levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines.
Methods: Twenty-four patients undergoing AAA exclusion were treated with ei
ther endovascular (n = 14) or conventional (n=10) techniques. Clinical and
hematological data, respiratory burst of neutrophils, and the expression of
adhesion and activation molecules (CD18, CD11b, CD69, and HLA-DR) were ana
lyzed by flow cytometry. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique wa
s used to measure proinflammatory cytokine interleukin (IL)-8 and anti-infl
ammatory cytokines IL-l receptor antagonist (IL-1RA) and transforming growt
h factor beta1 (TGF-beta1).
Results: All patients, most of whom had normal cytokine values before surge
ry, were successfully treated. No significant changes were found in surface
antigens. Basal respiratory burst was quite heterogeneous; in all cases re
spiratory burst activity decreased after surgery and remained low throughou
t the observation period. Despite marked interpatient differences, IL-1RA a
nd IL-8 increased after surgery, whereas TGF-beta1 decreased, although the
variation achieved statistical significance only in the conventional group.
Elevated IL-1RA returned to normal within 48 hours in the endoluminal grou
p, whereas the level remained high in the conventional group in the last sa
mple.
Conclusions: Despite heterogeneity before surgery, the respiratory burst de
creased for most of the patients regardless of the approach, and both techn
iques increased IL-1RA. Although both procedures seemed to decrease TGF-bet
a1, the difference was significant only with the conventional approach. IL-
1RA levels fell toward basal values quicker in the endograft patients, sugg
esting that the endoluminal approach was less aggressive.