To test the role of constructional and dimensional factors in the generatio
n of friction force by systems of setose attachment pads, sis species of sy
rphid fly (Platycheirus angustatus, Sphaerophoria scripfa, Episyrphus balte
atus, Eristalis tenax, Myathropa florea and Volucella pellucens) were studi
ed using light and scanning electron microscopy. Flies were selected accord
ing to their various body mass and attachment pad dimensions. Such variable
s as pad area, setal density, the area of a single setal tip and body mass
were individually; measured, if, centrifugal force tester, equipped with a
fibre-optic sensor, was used to measure the friction forces of the pads on
a smooth horizontal surface made of polyvinylchloride. Friction force, whic
h is the resistance force of the insect mass against the sum of centrifugal
and tangential forces, was greater in heavier insects such as Er, tenax, M
. florea and V. pellucens. Although lighter species generated lower frictio
nal forces, the acceleration required to detach an insect was greater in sm
aller species. The area of attachment pads, setal tip area and setal densit
y differed significantly in the species studied, and the dependence of thes
e variables on body mass was significant.
The frictional properties of the material of the setal tips were not depend
ent on the dimensions of the fly species. Similar results were obtained for
the frictional properties of the pulvillus as a whole. Thus, the propertie
s of the secretion and the mechanical properties of the material of the set
al tips are approximately constant among the species studied. It is conclud
ed that differences in friction force must be related mainly to variations
in the real contact area generated by the pad on the smooth surface. The re
al contact area can be estimated as the summed area of the broadened setal
tips of the pad in contact with the surface; The real contact area depends
on such morphological variables as setal density and the area of a single s
etal tip, Although individual variables vary among flies with different dim
ensions, they usually compensate such that smaller setal tip area is partia
lly compensated for by higher setal density.