Influence of preharvest tumor cell contamination in bone marrow or blood does not predict resultant tumor cell contamination of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilized stem cells

Citation
W. Kruger et al., Influence of preharvest tumor cell contamination in bone marrow or blood does not predict resultant tumor cell contamination of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilized stem cells, J HEMATH ST, 10(2), 2001, pp. 303-307
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Hematology,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
JOURNAL OF HEMATOTHERAPY & STEM CELL RESEARCH
ISSN journal
15258165 → ACNP
Volume
10
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
303 - 307
Database
ISI
SICI code
1525-8165(200104)10:2<303:IOPTCC>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
Tumor cell contamination of stem cell collections harvested from breast can cer patients is a common phenomenon described by several investigators but with findings that vary among reports, Although so-called co-mobilization o f these cells has been hypothesized, the origin of tumor cell contamination in stem cells is still unknown. A total of 47 G-CSF mobilized stem cell gr afts from patients with nodal-positive (n = 30), chemosensitive metastatic (n = 11), and 5 women with inflammatory breast cancer were evaluated for ca ncer cells by immunocytochemistry. Additionally, 40 bone marrow aspirations and 23 peripheral blood samples collected prior to apheresis and after one to two cycles of conventional chemotherapy were available for examination. Tumor cell contamination of leukapheresis correlated best with preharvest blood state. This was valid when the nominal (positive/negative) presence o f tumor cells in blood was compared to the nominal presence of tumor cells in apheresis samples and when the it was correlated to the tumor cell load of apheresis samples (TCL = tumor cells per 10(6) nucleated cells investiga ted). The correlation between blood and stem cells was better (nominal and quantitative) than that between marrow and stem cells, despite the larger s ample size of marrow aspirations. The presence or absence of cancer cells i n apheresis samples could not be safely predicted by the presence or absenc e of tumor cells in marrow or blood alone. Diagnostic specificity seems to improve from a combination of results from marrow and blood analysis. No co rrelation was found in quantitative analysis of tumor cell contamination be tween marrow and blood. In conclusion, the results suggest that blood and b one marrow represent different compartments for epithelial cancer cells and that contaminating tumor cells in stem cell harvests may be derived from t he blood and/or marrow compartment. The tumor cell contamination of a stem cell harvest cannot be safely predicted by a preceding blood or marrow anal ysis.