While the measurement of religion and spirituality has made significant pro
gress in the past few decades, we have seen increasing criticism of the dom
inant paradigm in the psychology of religion-intrinsic and extrinsic religi
ousness. A variety of new measures have been developed, notwithstanding Gor
such's (1984) admonition to the contrary. Religion and its post-modern offs
pring (spirituality) has become intensely personal, and the direction of th
e new measures in the field reflect this shift. Furthermore, several comple
xities of measuring this domain remain unresolved, such as the lack of prec
ision in definitions, illusory spiritual health, ceiling effects, social de
sirability, and bias. This article discusses these complexities, provides a
critical review of two widely used instruments, and reviews four newer ins
truments with promising theoretical perspectives and psychometric propertie
s.