Osteoporosis with low dose corticosteroids: Contribution of underlying disease effects and discriminatory ability of ultrasound versus bone densitometry

Citation
P. Sambrook et al., Osteoporosis with low dose corticosteroids: Contribution of underlying disease effects and discriminatory ability of ultrasound versus bone densitometry, J RHEUMATOL, 28(5), 2001, pp. 1063-1067
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Rheumatology,"da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
ISSN journal
0315162X → ACNP
Volume
28
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1063 - 1067
Database
ISI
SICI code
0315-162X(200105)28:5<1063:OWLDCC>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Objective. Corticosteroid use is associated with rapid bone loss, but the e ffect of low dose corticosteroids (CS) remains controversial and the extent to which increased fracture risk relates to quantitative effects, as refle cted by change in bone mineral density (BMD), or to qualitative effects due to altered microarchitecture is unclear, Moreover the contribution of the underlying disease, for which CS are used, confounds the assessment of CS e ffects on bone. Our aim was to examine these effects of CS on bone. Methods. We measured BMD, quantitative ultrasound (US), and clinical and ra diological disease indices in 76 patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) tr eated with or without low dose CS. Disease effects were quantitated using t he Health Assessment Questionnaire and radiological scores. Results. BMD and US measures were significantly reduced in RA patients comp ared to age matched controls. Low dose CS use was associated with a further small but nonsignificant reduction in BMD, and US measures did not further discriminate CS effects on bone. Radiological score was an independent pre dictor of US measures, suggesting that in RA, calcaneal bone may reflect bo th systemic and local disease effects. Conclusion. US did not appear to discriminate effects of low dose CS on bon e better than BMD. However, underlying RA disease effects on bone are detec table by US, Quantitative US should be investigated for its utility in asse ssing disease activity or progress in RA.