Md. Brown et al., Evaluation of liquid Bacillus thuringiensis var. israelensis products for control of Australian Aedes arbovirus vectors, J AM MOSQ C, 17(1), 2001, pp. 8-12
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Entomology/Pest Control
Journal title
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MOSQUITO CONTROL ASSOCIATION
Laboratory bioassay studies were conducted in southeast Queensland, Austral
ia,: on the efficacy of Teknar (R), VectoBac (R) 12AS, and Cybate (R) (acti
ve ingredient: 1,200 international toxic units Bacillus thuringiensis var,
israelensis [Bti]) against 3rd instars of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegyp
ti. Ae. notoscriptus, Ae. vigilax, and Ae. camptorhynchus. Probit analyses
were then used to determine LD,, (median lethal dose), LD95, and lethal dos
e ratios (LDR). Aedes aegypti and Ae. notoscriptus, both container-habitat
species, tolerated the highest Bti concentrations compared with saltmarsh A
e. vigilax and Ae. camptorhynchus. For example, the LDR for Ae. vigilax ver
sus Ae. notoscriptus exposed to Cybate was 0.14 (95% confidence limit [CL]
0.03-0.61). Similarly, the Cybate LDR for Ae. camptorhynchus versus Ae. not
oscriptus was 0.22 (95% CL 0.07-0.70). Teknar produced similar results with
an LDR of 0.21 (95% CL 0.04-1.10) for Aedes vigilax versus Aedes notoscrip
tus. Differences in product efficacy were found when tested against the 2 c
ontainer-breeding species. Cybate was less effective than Teknar with LDRs
of 1.55 (95% CL 0.65-3.67) and 1.87 (95% CL 0.68-5.15) for Aedes aegypti an
d Ae. notoscriptus, respectively. The significant differences in susceptibi
lity between mosquito species and varying efficacy between products highlig
ht the importance of evaluating concentration-response data prior to contra
cting with distributors of mosquito control products. This information is c
rucial to resistance management strategies.