Axial fatigue behavior of binder-treated versus diffusion alloyed powder metallurgy steels

Citation
N. Chawla et al., Axial fatigue behavior of binder-treated versus diffusion alloyed powder metallurgy steels, MAT SCI E A, 308(1-2), 2001, pp. 180-188
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Apllied Physucs/Condensed Matter/Materiales Science","Material Science & Engineering
Journal title
MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING A-STRUCTURAL MATERIALS PROPERTIES MICROSTRUCTURE AND PROCESSING
ISSN journal
09215093 → ACNP
Volume
308
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
180 - 188
Database
ISI
SICI code
0921-5093(20010630)308:1-2<180:AFBOBV>2.0.ZU;2-O
Abstract
A comparative study has been conducted on the microstructure, tensile, and axial fatigue behavior of two Fe-0.5Mo-1.5Cu-1.75Ni alloys, made by binder- treated and diffusion alloying processes. The mechanical properties will be explained in terms of the pore size and morphology, as well as the heterog eneous microstructures typical of ferrous powder metallurgy materials. Bind er treatment can provide a variety of advantages in manufacturing, over dif fusion alloyed powders, including faster and more consistent flow into the die cavity, increased green strength, and reduction of fine particle dustin g. In addition to conventional porosity, smaller, "copper diffusion" pores were observed where copper particles had been prior to forming a liquid pha se during sintering and diffusing into the Fe particles. The microstructure in both alloys was typical of PM alloy steels, with a heterogeneous micros tructure consisting of areas of "divorced pearlite," martensite, and nickel -rich ferrite. The modulus and tensile strength of both types of alloys wer e equivalent. Yield strength in the binder-treated alloy was higher which c oincided with somewhat lower ductility. The fatigue behavior in terms of st ress versus cycles (S-N curves) was almost identical for the two systems. F ractographic observations showed fracture to have initiated primarily at po re clusters in the surface region. Fracture surfaces after fatigue tests sh owed ductile fracture in the interparticle bridge regions, cleavage facets in pearlitic regions, and striations. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All ri ghts reserved.