Preferences for ascending and descending hierarchical organization in spatial communication

Citation
Jm. Plumert et al., Preferences for ascending and descending hierarchical organization in spatial communication, MEM COGNIT, 29(2), 2001, pp. 274-284
Citations number
17
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology
Journal title
MEMORY & COGNITION
ISSN journal
0090502X → ACNP
Volume
29
Issue
2
Year of publication
2001
Pages
274 - 284
Database
ISI
SICI code
0090-502X(200103)29:2<274:PFAADH>2.0.ZU;2-T
Abstract
People prefer to order spatial information in a hierarchy of decreasing siz e of spatial unit when giving directions for finding objects and in a hiera rchy of increasing size of spatial unit when providing descriptions of obje ct locations (Plumert, Carswell, DeVet, & Ihrig, 1995). In five experiments , we examined whether people have a preference for ascending or descending organization when the task does not involve conveying spatial information t o others. In Experiments 1-3, people learned the locations of objects in a model house and then verified statements describing those locations. People verified statements faster when spatial units were organized in an ascendi ng (i.e., small to large) than in a descending (i.e., large to small) or ra ndom order. In Experiment 4, people first performed a sentence verification task and afterward wrote down directions for finding the objects. People a gain exhibited a preference for ascending organization in the verification task but exhibited a preference for descending organization when giving dir ections for finding the same objects. Experiment 5 demonstrated that the as cending advantage was not due to the link between the object and small land mark. Discussion focuses on the role of pragmatics and memory retrieval in preferences for ascending versus descending hierarchical organization.