Suggestions to abandon New Zealand local stages, or to redefine their bound
aries solely at physically defined horizons, confuse the two very distinct
aims of a stage classification. These are objectively to order New Zealand
rocks on the basis of New Zealand biostratigraphic or other chronostratigra
phic criteria, and to allow correlation of the New Zealand time-scale with
the international one. For rapid, cost-effective identification of stages i
n geological mapping and other frontier situations, their boundaries must b
e characterised by biostratigraphic criteria, supplemented where appropriat
e by physical stratigraphic horizons (magnetic polarity reversals, sediment
ary cycle boundaries, and, in particular, tephras).
Carter & Naish resurrected all Wanganui Series substages. but the original
reasons for their proposal are outdated. Fleming's choice of subdivisions w
as governed by the "four glaciations" paradigm of the time, rather than the
current Milankovitch time-scale paradigm. New Zealand Pliocene-Pleistocene
stages need to be redefined at new stage-base boundaries (standard section
and point, or SSP), at horizons that allow them to be characterised by the
criteria of greatest utility in New Zealand.
Recommended stages and their SSPs (all sited in Wanganui Basin) are: Hawera
n Stage, base of Rangitawa Tephra (0.35 Ma), Rangitawa Stream, Rangitikei v
alley; Castlecliffian Stage, base of Ototoka tephra, Ototoka Beach, Wanganu
i; Nukumaruan Stage, base of Hautawa Shellbed, Hautawa Road, Rangitikei val
ley; Mangapanian Stage, base of Mangapani Shellbed, Mangapunipuni Stream, W
aitotara valley. The SSPs for the Waipipian and Opoitian Stages need to be
redefined using integrated molluscan, foraminiferal, and physical stratigra
phic horizons in a continuous section in Wanganui Basin. preferably the Wan
ganui River section.