This paper introduces a new tool based on a traditional noise analysis tech
niques for monitoring reactor components' signal condition. It also present
s the performance of artificial neural networks for pattern recognition to
the same set of reactor signals and provides a comparison of these two tech
niques. Reactor pump signals from the Experimental Breeder Reactor (EBR-II)
are utilized here. Collected signals such as pump power, pump speed, and p
ump pressure are obtained from already installed sensors in the reactor. Th
e signals utilized are collected signals as well sis generated signals simu
lating the pump shaft degradation progress. From the study of time series a
nalysis and regression modeling of these signals, a parameter related to de
gradation and material buildup in the shaft is identified and used in the d
evelopment of a monitoring tool. The results are then used as a benchmark a
gainst which to test the performance of artificial neural networks as a too
l for reactor diagnostics.
Several neural networks are examined in this study, including Restricted Co
ulomb Energy (RCE), Cascade Correlation, and Backpropagation paradigms of a
rtificial neural networks. RCE is selected due to its unique design and spe
ed, Backpropagation is selected because it is widely used and well accepted
in the neural network research community, and Cascade correlation is selec
ted because it overcomes some of the problems associated with the Backpropa
gation paradigm. Similar study is performed using the Adaptive Resonance Th
eory (ART) family of neural network paradigms.
The results of this study indicate that artificial neural networks are simp
ler techniques for pattern recognition than noise analysis techniques such
as the one introduced here. Neural networks do not require prior fault rela
ted parameter identification; they generate their own rules by learning fro
m being shown examples. On the other hand, noise analysis and regression mo
deling can provide very sensitive techniques for monitoring of a detected p
roblem in a component. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.