This paper examines the often stated idea that the poor do not support high
levels of redistribution because of the hope that they, or their offspring
, may make it up the income ladder. This "prospect of upward mobility" (POU
M) hypothesis is shown to be fully compatible with rational expectations, a
nd fundamentally linked to concavity in the mobility process. A steady-stat
e majority could even be simultaneously poorer than average in terms of cur
rent income, and richer than average in terms of expected future incomes. A
first empirical assessment suggests, on the other hand, that in recent U.
S. data the POUM effect is probably dominated by the demand for social insu
rance.