Three experiments examined the influence of perceivers' attitudes on their
outcome-biased trait inferences. Participants supporting or opposing mandat
ory teacher resting read about the attempts of a teacher to pass a competen
cy test. In ail experiments, participants supportive of mandatory teacher t
esting made outcome-biased inferences about the teacher, judging her to be
more intelligent and competent when she passed the test than when she faile
d, even though her performance on both tests was held constant. Participant
s opposed to mandatory testing made inferences about the teacher that were
not outcome-biased. Experiment 3 showed that participants' beliefs about th
e diagnosticity of the competency test mediated the biasing effects of outc
omes on trait inferences. The motivational bases of outcome-biased inferenc
es are discussed.