Cost-effectiveness ratio (CER) is defined as the ratio of the difference in
cost between a test and standard health care programme to the difference i
n benefit, respectively. Methods to obtain confidence intervals for CERs ar
e either variants of Fieller's method (1954), or bootstrap methods. We stud
y the effect of outliers in cost measures on the precision of confidence in
terval procedures for CERs. In particular the performance of the procedures
under single and multiple case influential deletion diagnostics, respectiv
ely, are evaluated. Simulation studies suggest that the bias-corrected perc
entile bootstrap procedure gives better precision and coverage under either
diagnostic. Copyright (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.