OBJECTIVES: We compared manometric recordings of the upper esophageal sphin
cter (UES) recorded with a miniature sleeve to those obtained using standar
d manometry.
METHODS: The UES pressure of eight volunteer subjects was measured by stati
on pull-through (SPT), by rapid pull-through (RPT), and with a microsleeve
sensor for 30 min, followed by 15 mill of esophageal acid infusion. Degluti
tive UES relaxation recorded with a microsleeve and solid state sensor were
compared.
RESULTS: The UES pressure recorded with the microsleeve (25 +/- 9 mm Hg) wa
s significantly less than that by SPT (114 +/- 18 mm Hg) or RPT (152 +/- 19
mm Hg), and was unaffected by acid infusion. Periods of low UES pressure w
ere observed during long interswallow intervals (II +/- 4, range 6-18 mm Hg
). Deglutitive relaxation duration and intrabolus pressure measured with th
e microsleeve were less than those recorded by the solid state transducer.
CONCLUSIONS: "Normal" UES pressure is heavily dependent on measurement, tec
hnique; pressures obtained with a miniature sleeve are a fraction of those
obtained by SPT or RPT. During periods of relative comfort with minimal swa
llowing, UES tone is approximately 10 mm Hg, similar to that during sleep.
Volume modulation of deglutitive UES relaxation is demonstrable with a micr
osleeve, albeit with less precision than with a solid-state transducer. (C)
2001 by Am. Cell. of Gastroenterology.