Si. Hwang et al., Comparative analysis of MR imaging, positron emission tomography, and ictal single-photon emission CT in patients with neocortical epilepsy, AM J NEUROR, 22(5), 2001, pp. 937-946
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Neurosciences & Behavoir
BACKGROUND AN PURPOSE: MR imaging, positron emission tomography (PET), and
single-photon emission CT (SPECT) play important roles in presurgical local
ization of epileptic foci. However, comparative study of these imaging meth
ods for cases of neocortical epilepsy has been limited, The purpose of this
study was to compare the sensitivities of these three imaging methods for
presurgical localization of neocortical epileptogenic foci.
METHODS: We studied 117 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for intr
actable neocortical epilepsy, The pathologic substrates were neuronal migra
tion disorder (n = 77), tumor (n = 15), and others (n = 25), MR imaging was
compared retrospectively with F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose PEI and ictal techne
tium-99m hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime SPECT regarding their capability to
correctly localize the epileptogenic foci, The pathologic findings were us
ed as the standard of reference.
RESULTS: Overall, MR imaging, PET, and ictal SPECT correctly localized the
lesions for 59.8%, 77.7%, and 70.3% of the patients, respectively, with a 3
8% concordance rate among the three methods. PET was most sensitive (71-100
%) in detecting all substrates. MR imaging was as sensitive (100%) as PET i
n detecting turner but was least sensitive (48.1%) in detecting neuronal mi
gration disorder, Ictal SPECT was more sensitive (75.8%) than MR imaging in
detecting neuronal migration disorder. Patients with imaging abnormalities
achieved good outcomes in 81.4% of the cases, in contrast to 59.5% for tho
se without imaging abnormalities (P < .05).
CONCLUSION: PET and ictal SPECT were overall more sensitive than was MR ima
ging, despite the low concordance rate and variable sensitivity depending o
n substrates, The detection of abnormalities by MR imaging was associated w
ith good outcome, PET or ictal SPECT can be well used as complementary tool
s, particularly hn cases of negative MR imaging findings.