IS P53 EXPRESSION, DETECTED BY IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY, AN IMPORTANT PARAMETER OF RESPONSE TO TREATMENT IN TESTIS CANCER

Citation
H. Eid et al., IS P53 EXPRESSION, DETECTED BY IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY, AN IMPORTANT PARAMETER OF RESPONSE TO TREATMENT IN TESTIS CANCER, Anticancer research, 17(4A), 1997, pp. 2663-2669
Citations number
43
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology
Journal title
ISSN journal
02507005
Volume
17
Issue
4A
Year of publication
1997
Pages
2663 - 2669
Database
ISI
SICI code
0250-7005(1997)17:4A<2663:IPEDBI>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Background: Several prior studies revealed positive ;p53 expression vi a immunohistochemistry (IHC) in a large percentage of germ cell testic ular cancers (GCTTs). However; the predicting and prognostic value of this protein remains to be defined. Therefore, the aim of our study wa s to further clarify the role of p53 protein in GCITs and to look for correlations between its gene expression and other disease parameters, including histological subtype, stage and clinical resistance/sensiti vity. Furthermore, we correlated p53 protein expression with that of M DRI gene product protein (Pgp) in older to examine the interrelationsh ip between these two markers. Patients and methods: 77 untreated patie nts with GCTTs were investigated for their p53 expression using monocl onal antibody and immunohistochemistry in paraffin-embedded specimens. There were 34 patients with stage I, 16 with stage II, 27 with stage III disease. Results: All tumor types, except differentiated teratomas , were immunoreactive for p53 to a various extent ranging from scarcel y positive to homogeneously stained tumor cells. Seminomas (S) and emb ryonal carcinoma (EC) components showed the most positive nuclear stai ning. p53 expression showed a significant inverse correlation with the stage of disease (P<0.0003). There was a significant positive relatio nship between p53 immunoreactivity and response to treatment (P=0.0012 ), i.e. high levels of p53 expression correlated with clinical sensiti vity of the tumors to chemotherapy. We could demonstrate a statistical ly significant opposite relationship between p53 and Pgp immunoreactiv ity (P<0.0005). Conclusion: Our results show that p53 status in tumor cells may be a strong determinate of susceptibility to chemotherapy an d that p53 overexpression has a favourable prognosis in terms of respo nse to treatment in GCTTs. Moreover, the findings provide clinical evi dence for the presence of significant relationship between p53 and MDR 1/Pgp immunoreactivity. They also suggest that patients resistant to c hemotherapy and lacking p53 expression might benefit from an alternati ve appropriately designed chemotherapeutic regimen to achieve further successful treatment in GCTTs.