Gb. Cross et al., Changes in nutrient intake during the menstrual cycle of overweight women with premenstrual syndrome, BR J NUTR, 85(4), 2001, pp. 475-482
This study presents the nutrient data collected from women who were being s
creened for premenstrual syndrome (PMS) for entry into an intervention stud
y. Screening was by the Steiner self-rated questionnaire. One hundred and f
orty-four overweight women completed the screening process and eighty-eight
met the criteria for PMS. All women kept 4 d diet diaries pre- and postmen
strually over two menstrual cycles. The mean energy and macronutrient intak
es were compared between the pre- and postmenstrual phases. Energy and macr
onutrient intake was also calculated according to food categories. Goldberg
's cut-off limit for the ratio of energy intake to estimated basal metaboli
c rate was used to exclude data that was incompatible with predicted energy
requirements. The diet diaries were also used to determine the mean number
of meals or snacks eaten pre- and postmenstrually. Nutrient analysis of th
e diet diaries of the women with PMS showed a significant increase (P < 0.0
01) in total energy and all macronutrients premenstrually when compared to
nutrient intake postmenstrually. Women who did not meet the criteria for PM
S showed a significant increase in energy and fat intake (P < 0.05) but not
in the other macronutrients. When adjusted for energy, data collected from
women with PMS showed a premenstrual significant increase in fat, carbohyd
rate (P < 0.05) and simple sugars (P < 0.001). There was a significant decr
ease (P < 0.001) in protein premenstrually. Women not meeting the PMS crite
ria showed no significant difference between pre- and postmenstrual intakes
when adjusted for energy. Analysis according to food categories in women w
ith PMS showed a significantly greater intake premenstrually of energy and
all macronutrients for cereals, cakes and desserts and high-sugar foods (P
< 0.001). In women with PMS there was a significantly greater number of 'ep
isodes of eating' premenstrually (P < 0.001). This study provides further e
vidence, to support the very limited number of earlier studies, that there
is a group of women with PMS who increase their nutrient intake during the
premenstrual phase. This could potentially be a contributing factor for som
e women experiencing difficulties adhering to suggested dietary modificatio
n and should be considered when counselling premenopausal women.