Changes in nutrient intake during the menstrual cycle of overweight women with premenstrual syndrome

Citation
Gb. Cross et al., Changes in nutrient intake during the menstrual cycle of overweight women with premenstrual syndrome, BR J NUTR, 85(4), 2001, pp. 475-482
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Food Science/Nutrition","Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
ISSN journal
00071145 → ACNP
Volume
85
Issue
4
Year of publication
2001
Pages
475 - 482
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-1145(200104)85:4<475:CINIDT>2.0.ZU;2-X
Abstract
This study presents the nutrient data collected from women who were being s creened for premenstrual syndrome (PMS) for entry into an intervention stud y. Screening was by the Steiner self-rated questionnaire. One hundred and f orty-four overweight women completed the screening process and eighty-eight met the criteria for PMS. All women kept 4 d diet diaries pre- and postmen strually over two menstrual cycles. The mean energy and macronutrient intak es were compared between the pre- and postmenstrual phases. Energy and macr onutrient intake was also calculated according to food categories. Goldberg 's cut-off limit for the ratio of energy intake to estimated basal metaboli c rate was used to exclude data that was incompatible with predicted energy requirements. The diet diaries were also used to determine the mean number of meals or snacks eaten pre- and postmenstrually. Nutrient analysis of th e diet diaries of the women with PMS showed a significant increase (P < 0.0 01) in total energy and all macronutrients premenstrually when compared to nutrient intake postmenstrually. Women who did not meet the criteria for PM S showed a significant increase in energy and fat intake (P < 0.05) but not in the other macronutrients. When adjusted for energy, data collected from women with PMS showed a premenstrual significant increase in fat, carbohyd rate (P < 0.05) and simple sugars (P < 0.001). There was a significant decr ease (P < 0.001) in protein premenstrually. Women not meeting the PMS crite ria showed no significant difference between pre- and postmenstrual intakes when adjusted for energy. Analysis according to food categories in women w ith PMS showed a significantly greater intake premenstrually of energy and all macronutrients for cereals, cakes and desserts and high-sugar foods (P < 0.001). In women with PMS there was a significantly greater number of 'ep isodes of eating' premenstrually (P < 0.001). This study provides further e vidence, to support the very limited number of earlier studies, that there is a group of women with PMS who increase their nutrient intake during the premenstrual phase. This could potentially be a contributing factor for som e women experiencing difficulties adhering to suggested dietary modificatio n and should be considered when counselling premenopausal women.