Objective To determine whether prophylactic antibiotic administration using
cefoxitin at the time of elective caesarean section significantly reduces
infectious morbidity.
Setting A tertiary teaching hospital in a large urban city in South Africa.
Participants Women undergoing elective caesarean section.
Design A prospective, double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial.
Methods Four hundred and eighty women undergoing elective caesarean section
had cefoxitin or placebo administration after umbilical cord clamping. Pos
tpartum complications including febrile morbidity, wound infection, endomet
ritis, urinary tract infection, pneumonia and transient postpartum fever we
re recorded, as were the duration of hospital stay and the need for therape
utic antibiotics.
Results Wound infection was the most common complication occurring in 13.3%
and 12.5% of women in the placebo and cefoxitin groups, respectively. Prop
hylactic antibiotics did not decrease febrile morbidity, wound infection, e
ndometritis, urinary tract infection and pneumonia. Women who received cefo
xitin stayed on average a day less in hospital than those who received plac
ebo (6.9 vs 7.8 days, risk difference 0.94 CI 1.57-0.31 days). Eleven women
(4.6%) in the placebo group and eight (3.4%) in the cefoxitin group had mi
crobiological evidence of wound infection. Staphylococcus aureus was the mo
st common pathogen (43%) isolated. Similar proportions in both groups (6.3%
placebo and 5.1% cefoxitin) required a course of therapeutic antibiotics.
Conclusion Antibiotic prophylaxis with cefoxitin in elective caesarean sect
ion did not reduce post-operative infectious morbidity in this double-blind
randomised placebo controlled trial.