Open verdict v. suicide - importance to research

Citation
Kr. Linsley et al., Open verdict v. suicide - importance to research, BR J PSYCHI, 178, 2001, pp. 465-468
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Psychiatry,"Clinical Psycology & Psychiatry","Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
ISSN journal
00071250 → ACNP
Volume
178
Year of publication
2001
Pages
465 - 468
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-1250(200105)178:<465:OVVS-I>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
Background Open verdicts are often included in with suicides for research p urposes and for setting health targets. Aims To examine similarities and differences in cases defined by the corone r as suicide and open verdicts and the implications of open verdicts for su icide research. Method All cases of open and suicide verdicts recorded in the Newcastle Cor oner's Court in the period 1985-1994 were compared on demographic and medic al parameters. Results Open and suicide verdicts had many similarities, differing only in some respects, of which logistic regression identified the most significant to be a suicide note, method used and age. Conclusions Open verdicts should be included in all suicide research after excluding cases in which suicide was unlikely Objective criteria are needed to facilitate comparison between different studies. Declaration of interest None.