A. De Lorenzo et al., Body composition analysis and changes in airways function in obese adults after hypocaloric diet, CHEST, 119(5), 2001, pp. 1409-1415
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Study objectives: To determine the relationship between weight-loss and pul
monary function indexes, focusing on forced expiratory flows tie, FEV,, for
ced expiratory flow at 50% of vital capacity [FEF50], forced expiratoly flo
w at 75% of vital capacity, and forced expiratory flow at 25 to 75% of vita
l capacity [FEF25-75]). Specifically, to determine the effect of losses in
total and segmental fat mass (FM) and of modifications in lean body mass, a
fter restricted hypocaloric diet, on pulmonary function among obese adults.
Design: Cross-sectional, observational.
Settings: Human Physiology Division, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, "Tor
Vergata" University, Rome, Italy.
Patients: Thirty obese adults (mean [+/- SD] baseline body mass index [BMI]
, 32.25 +/- 3.99 kg/m(2)), without significant obstructive airway disease,
were selected from among participants in a weight-loss program.
Measurements and results: Anthropometric, body composition (BC), and respir
atory parameters of all participants were measured before and after weight
loss. Total and segmental lean body and FM were obtained by dual-energy x-r
ay absorptiometry. Dynamic spirometric tests and maximum voluntary ventilat
ion (MVV) were performed. The BC parameters tie, body weight [BW], BMI, the
sum skinfold thicknesses, thoracic inhalation circumference, thoracic expi
ration circumference, total FM, and trunk FM [FMtrunk]) were significantly
decreased (p less than or equal to 0.0001) after a hypocaloric diet. The me
an vital capacity, FEV1, FEF50, FEF25-75, expiratory reserve volume, and MV
V significantly increased (p less than or equal to 0.05) with weight loss.
The correlation coefficient for Delta FEF25-75 (r = 0.20) was numerically h
igher than Delta FEF50 and Delta FEV1 (r = 0.14 and r = 0.08, respectively)
for the BW loss. Moreover, the correlation coefficient for Delta FEF25-75
(r = 0.45) was significantly higher (p less than or equal to 0.02) than tho
se for Delta FEF50 and Delta FEV1 (r = 0.38 and r = 0.15, respectively) for
FMtrunk loss.
Conclusions: This study shows that a decrease in total and upper body fat o
btained by restricted diet was not accompanied by a decrease in ventilatory
muscle mass. FMtrunk loss was found to have improved airflow limitation, w
hich can be correlated to peripheral airways function.