Research approaches to 'youth' and 'adolescence' in many disciplines have b
een shaped by the western construction of adolescence as a period of inevit
able 'Storm and Stress', although researchers in anthropology and cultural
studies have questioned the value of this model. British research on youth
cultures and subcultures during the 1970s presented a critique of dominant
representations of (particular groups of) young people as 'troubled' or 'tr
oubling'. The 1980s saw a decline in this work due in part to the rise of t
he New Right, postmodern critiques of ethnographic research and cuts in soc
ial science research funding, especially for radical qualitative studies. T
he 1990s saw something of a resurgence of radical youth research. and a tra
nsformed cultural studies approach remains central to this endeavour. The 1
990s also brought the construction of a 'new Europe' following the demise o
f the Soviet Union and the fall of the Berlin Wall in 1989. At the turn of
the century, youth research began to engage with theories of globalization
and the notion of global youth culture(s). This article discusses the impor
tance of maintaining a critical perspective on these questions, and the pos
sibility of a fruitful debate between globalization theory and youth cultur
al research. Examples from recent youth studies are considered as possible
means of developing a continued critique of the 'youth as trouble' paradigm
in the context of an engagement with globalization theory.