In this paper, we address the question of how flesh-and-blood decision-make
rs manage the combinatorial explosion in scenario development for decision
making under uncertainty. The first assumption is that the decision-makers
try to undertake 'robust' actions. For the decision-maker, a robust action
is an action that results in sufficiently good result whatever the events a
re. We examine the psychological as well as the theoretical problems raised
by the notion of robustness. Finally, we address the false feeling of deci
sion-makers who talk of 'risk control'. We argue that risk control results
from the thinking that one can postpone action after nature moves. This 'ac
tion postponement' amounts to change look-ahead reasoning into diagnosis. (
C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.