Objective: To determine a propel scanning resolution for digitizing bitewin
g radiographs in the detection of approximal caries,
Methods: Fifty-two premolars and 48 molars were mounted in blocks and image
d on conventional film (Ektaspeed Plus, Eastman-Kodak, Rochester, NY USA) s
imulating a bitewing projection. The 15 bitewing radiographs were then scan
ned with a flatbed scanner at three resolutions 150, 300 and 600 d.p.i. The
digitized images M:eri displayed in random order on a high-resolution cath
ode my tube monitor. Tell observers assessed tile caries status of 200 appr
oximal surfaces. They scored lesion presence on a 5-point confidence scale
and depth on a 3-point scale. The observer's scores were compared with tile
results from a histological examination. Data were analysed using analysis
of variance hv calculating signed observed error, absolute observer error
and observer confidence.
Results: Lesion depth had a significant effect on confidence of lesion reco
gnition. Tile main effect of resolution and the intel action between resolu
tion and lesion depth were significant. Pair-wise comparison showed a signi
ficant difference between resolutions in case of sound surfaces and surface
s with dentinal lesion for absolute error. The confidence increased as the
resolution increased but no significant difference was found between 300 an
d 600 d.p.i. The best score for depth estimation was obtained at the 300 d.
p.i. scanning resolution.
Conclusions: When bitewing radiographs are scanned with a flatbed scanner,
a resolution of 300 d.p.i, seems the best choice. At this resolution the di
gital file size is manageable without significant loss of the information n
ecessary for caries diagnosis.