In March 2000, the European Commission presented a Green Paper on greenhous
e gas emissions trading within Europe, supporting implementation of a Commu
nity-wide scheme in which the design and regulation of all essential elemen
ts would be harmonized at the Community level. The present paper analyzes e
conomic arguments used to justify such a coordinated scenario, showing thes
e arguments to be based on misleading rhetoric about fair trade and harmoni
zation. Diverse allocations of emissions allowances across Member Stales ar
e justified in theory. In practice, too, no empirical evidence or model-bas
ed results demonstrate that an uncoordinated European trading scheme would
adversely affect competitiveness to any significant extent or substantially
increase industrial relocations. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights
reserved.