The aim of this study was to assess whether the quality of the surgical act
could be an important prognostic factor for patients undergoing radical pr
ostatectomy. This study also aims to investigate whether the surgical quali
ty can be assessed by any means. Questionnaires were collected from 23 diff
erent institutes including 232 radical prostatectomies (RPr) performed fur
T1T2 prostate cancer. Blood loss, duration of surgery, margin status, posto
perative prostate specific antigen (PSA) and urinary incontinence were anal
ysed and correlated with the yearly number of RPr performed. The mean value
s obtained for each parameter were very different in the various centres. T
he outcome in terms of tumour control and incontinence could not be related
to a. higher or lower number of RPr performed. Quality control of RPr is f
easible on the basis of an analysis of a few parameters, such as surgical m
argins; postoperative PSA and incontinence, that might recognise urologists
that perform better or poorer than a proposed average. (C) 2001 Elsevier S
cience Ltd. All rights reserved.