Using a reduced equivalent diameter for a prefabricated vertical drain to account for smear

Citation
Al. Welker et al., Using a reduced equivalent diameter for a prefabricated vertical drain to account for smear, GEOSYNTH IN, 7(1), 2000, pp. 47-57
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Civil Engineering
Journal title
GEOSYNTHETICS INTERNATIONAL
ISSN journal
10726349 → ACNP
Volume
7
Issue
1
Year of publication
2000
Pages
47 - 57
Database
ISI
SICI code
1072-6349(2000)7:1<47:UAREDF>2.0.ZU;2-W
Abstract
Many different formulations for converting a prefabricated vertical drain w ith a rectangular cross section to an equivalent diameter well have been de veloped. in addition to equivalent diameter, engineers must also consider t he impact of smear when designing a system that utilizes prefabricated vert ical drains. An experiment and mathematical modeling were used to study the validity of using a reduced equivalent diameter to account for smear. Math ematical modeling of the four most commonly used equivalent diameter formul ations yielded nearly the same equipotentials. In addition, the equipotenti als calculated for the equivalent diameter wells differed substantially fro m a prefabricated vertical drain modeled with and without smear. This indic ates that equipotentials are not the best means to evaluate equivalent diam eter formulations because the change in shape from a rectangle to a circle impacts the head values to such a degree that the equipotentials will never be similar, regardless of whether smear is included.