Studies using cluster analysis as a method to identify distinct subtypes of
developmental coordination disorder (DCD) have been inconclusive leading s
ome authors to conclude that the method of cluster analysis should be aband
oned while others call for the validation of previously defined subtypes. T
he objective of the current study was to examine the use of cluster analysi
s as a method of searching for subtypes of DCD to gain a better understandi
ng of how different samples and different measures influence the interpreta
tion of results. The paper provides a detailed review of three commonly cit
ed cluster analytical studies and then explores the possible reasons for th
e discrepant results by replicating the approach with a different clinical
sample. The results highlight the impact of different measures on cluster s
tructure and the importance of adoption of a common standard to facilitate
interpretation across studies. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights re
served.