A. Mcwhinnie, Should offspring from donated gametes continue to be denied knowledge of their origins and antecedents?, HUM REPR, 16(5), 2001, pp. 807-817
This paper presents the case for a change from the current practice of anon
ymity and secrecy in the use of donated gametes in medically assisted conce
ption. It does so by describing history of the practice, various committees
of enquiry over the years, their recommendations for consideration of the
children created and the need for follow-up of the outcome; presenting the
evidence from outcome studies both about child development and family relat
ionships where secrecy is maintained about the child's origin and those whe
re the practice is openly to acknowledge their origins, This is followed by
an analysis of the experience and views of these children once they are ad
ults. In discussion of the composite findings recurring themes emerge, From
this it is concluded that offspring from donated gametes should not contin
ue to be denied knowledge of their origins and antecedents. In the public d
ebate, four schools of thought are identified. Possible practical scenarios
to implement change are discussed. This paper argues that the fundamental
issue regarding any of these remains-that priority in decision-making shoul
d be the lifelong well-being of the children being created.