Validation of coastal sea and lake surface temperature measurements derived from NOAA/AVHRR data

Citation
X. Li et al., Validation of coastal sea and lake surface temperature measurements derived from NOAA/AVHRR data, INT J REMOT, 22(7), 2001, pp. 1285-1303
Citations number
34
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING
ISSN journal
01431161 → ACNP
Volume
22
Issue
7
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1285 - 1303
Database
ISI
SICI code
0143-1161(20010510)22:7<1285:VOCSAL>2.0.ZU;2-H
Abstract
An interactive validation monitoring system is being used at the NOAA/NESDI S to validate the sea surface temperature (SST) derived from the NOAA-12 an d NOAA-14 polar orbiting satellite AVHRR sensors for the NOAA CoastWatch pr ogram. In 1997, we validated the SST in coastal regions of the Gulf of Mexi co, Southeast US and Northeast US and the lake surface temperatures in the Great Lakes every other month. The in situ temperatures measured by 24 NOAA moored buoys were used as ground data. The non-linear SST (NLSST) algorith m was used for all AVHRR SST estimations except during the day in the Great Lakes where the linear multichannel SST (MCSST) algorithm was used. The bu oy-satellite matchups were made within one image pixel in space (1.1 km at nadir) and +/-1 h in time. For the NOAA-12 satellite, the validation results for the three coastal reg ions (Gulf of Mexico, Southeast US and Northeast US) showed that the mean t emperature difference between satellite and buoy surface temperature (bias) was about 0.4 degreesC during the day and 0.2 degreesC at night. The stand ard deviation was about 1.0 degreesC. Great Lakes validation results showed a bias less than 0.3 degreesC during the day. However, due to the early mo rning fog situation in the summer months in the Great Lakes region, the NLS ST night algorithm yielded a fairly large bias of about 1.5 degreesC. The same statistics were computed for the NOAA-14 satellite measurements. F or the coastal regions, the bias was less than 0.2 degreesC with a standard deviation about 1.0 degreesC. For the Great Lakes region, the bias was abo ut 0.4 degreesC for both day and night with a standard deviation about 1.0 degreesC. Our study also showed that the NLSST algorithm provides the same order of S ST accuracy over all study regions and under a wide range of environmental conditions.