This article looks at the struggles and actions over environmental issues i
n the context of the developing world. Drawing on some well-known cases acr
oss three continents, Asia, Africa and Latin America, the article looks at
the strengths and weaknesses of the 'livelihood approach' that seems to dom
inate the analysis of environmental movements. It is argued that while the
livelihood approach may be appropriate to explain resource conflicts, the s
tudy of movements requires attention on political variables: actors, stakes
and practices, and so forth. The article therefore calls for a forceful in
tegration of collective action and social movement theories with livelihood
approaches to better understand environmental movements.