The effect of administering gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist with recombinant-human growth hormone (GH) on the final height of girls with isolated GH deficiency: Results from a controlled study

Citation
G. Saggese et al., The effect of administering gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist with recombinant-human growth hormone (GH) on the final height of girls with isolated GH deficiency: Results from a controlled study, J CLIN END, 86(5), 2001, pp. 1900-1904
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrynology, Metabolism & Nutrition","Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM
ISSN journal
0021972X → ACNP
Volume
86
Issue
5
Year of publication
2001
Pages
1900 - 1904
Database
ISI
SICI code
0021-972X(200105)86:5<1900:TEOAGH>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
To assess whether delaying puberty may improve final height in GH-deficient children with a poor height prediction at early puberty, we studied 24 gir ls with isolated GH deficiency until they reached their final height, in a controlled trial. Patients were taking recombinant human GH (r-hGH) substit utive therapy from 2.1 +/- 0.5 yr (0.1 IU/kg day sc) before entering the st udy, without showing any improvement in height prediction (149.6 +/- 2.9 vs .150.3 +/- 2.2 cm) on entering puberty. Fourteen girls agreed to add a GnRH agonist (GnRHa) to r-hGH, whereas the remaining 10 decided against it and served as controls. At the start of the study, girls treated with or withou t GnRHa had similar auxological characteristics (bone age, 10.9 +/- 0.6 vs. 10.7 +/- 1.3 yr; height SD score for chronological age, -1.87 +/- 0.3 vs. -1.82 +/- 0.2), including pubertal development. The GnRHa (long-acting D-Tr p-6-GnRH) was given at 60 mug/kg im every 28 days for 1.9 +/- 0.9 yr, then patients continued the r-hGH at the same dosage (3.1 +/- 0.7 yr). At the en d of the study, bone age was 16.2 +/- 0.3 yr in GnRHa-treated girls and 16. 6 +/- 0.9 yr in controls. Bone maturation was significantly slower during G nRHa (1.4 +/- 0.2 yr), and height so score for bone age improved (-0.31 +/- 0.3) in comparison with controls (2.6 +/- 0.4 yr and -1.35 +/- 0.3 SD scor e; P < 0.001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). As a result, girls given the co mbined therapy reached a final height higher than that of controls (height SD score, -0.39 +/- 0.5 vs. -1.45 +/- 0.2; P < 0.0001) and also higher than their midparental height(-1.1 +/- 0.5; P < 0.0005). Controls reached their midparental height. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that slowing pu bertal development with the administration of GnRHa for a limited time may improve final height in GH-deficient girls selected because of a poor heigh t prediction at early puberty.