The purpose of this paper is to consider how gender, class and power have b
een addressed in the work stress literature and to propose an alternative a
pproach that highlights the role of power in the development of work-relate
d stress. We begin with a discussion and critique of prominent work-related
stress models. The models' conceptualizations of work-related stress and t
heir relationships to issues of class and gender are used as focal points f
or discussion. We show that explanations for gender or class differences in
stress vary markedly by disciplinary perspective. Some models emphasize in
dividual coping mechanisms, while other models focus on individual-level ex
posures or the work environment, in the production of work-related stress.
Notions of power or control are often invoked in these models, but they ten
d to be narrowly conceptualized. Often the research presents a series of em
pirical findings rather than an integrated conceptual model which clearly s
pecifies the pathways by which individual work experiences are linked to he
alth and to the broader social context. Drawing on empirical findings and t
heoretical insights from a broad range of disciplinary perspectives, we bui
ld a conceptual framework relating power to work-related stress. This model
can provide us with a deeper understanding of the determinants of stress,
the relationships between stress and the broader social context, and the re
lationships between stress and social factors such as class and gender. Spe
cifically, we suggest that power can influence work-related stress through
the distribution of stressors in the workplace and via meaning. Copyright (
C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.