Advocates of juvenile curfews claim that they are useful for both minimizin
g victimization of young people, as well as a tool to aid in the deterrence
of offenses by youthful offenders. Opponents claim that curfews have only
interim, short-term effects on youth misconduct and violate the civil right
s of young people. This research note reports initial data from a national
survey of police agencies to determine the extent of curfew use and its per
ceived effects. The study found that most jurisdictions with curfews had th
e ordinances in effect for several years. In the vast majority of cases, th
ey felt that curfew was an effective tool to control vandalism, graffiti, n
ighttime burglary, and auto theft. Those jurisdictions that did not have cu
rfews typically reported that the nonexistence of a curfew was largely a re
sult of political reasons. even if the police supported such an ordinance.
(C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.