An examination of the equivalence between non-adaptive computer-based and traditional testing

With the increasing availability of computer-based testing programs, many i nstructors are beginning to adapt traditional paper-pencil tests to electro nic formats. While there are advantages to computer-based testing over trad itional testing, there is considerable debate concerning the equivalence of scores obtained from these testing modalities. Past research has cited lim itations in computer-based testing (such as inability to review questions, change answers or skip questions, and the motivation of the examinees) that may impact test-takers' scores and reduce equivalence to identical paper-p encil tests. The purpose of the current study is to examine the equivalence between computer-based and traditional tests when the computer testing pro gram provides opportunities comparable to paper testing conditions. Twenty- seven introductory psychology students completed ten identical unit tests v ia paper or computer. The results indicated that, when students are motivat ed and testing conditions are equivalent, there are no differences between the scores obtained via computer-based or paper-pencil tests.