Although channeled lava flows are common in basaltic volcanism, relationshi
ps between channel morphology, eruption and emplacement parameters, and lav
a properties are not well understood. Several models have commonly been use
d to constrain these relations, but they have not been well tested on natur
al or simulated lava flows over a wide range of parameter space. Here, we t
est the accuracy and assumptions of a moderately simple analytic rectangula
r channel solution by comparing the behavior of well-controlled laboratory
polyethylene glycol (PEG) channeled flows to the analytic solution for isot
hermal, steady Newtonian flow in a rectangular channel with constant dimens
ions. This analytic solution agrees well with laboratory measurements. Volu
metric effusion rates (Q; m(3) s(-1)) calculated from the analytical model
using measured PEG flows as input yield ratios of Q(calculated)/Q(pumped) o
f similar to0.2 to 3.6, and flow rates calculated from a best fit surface v
elocity profile to measured velocities give more accurate ratios of similar
to0.8 to 1.2. We find a very weak dependence of solution accuracy on slope
, attributable to flow front effects within the laboratory flows. We subseq
uently apply the solution to several subaerial and submarine terrestrial fl
ows as well as extraterrestrial channeled flows over a wide range of flow p
arameters. Viscosity ranges and flow rates obtained using measured channel
dimensions and assumed lava properties are plausible. Interestingly, the re
sulting extraterrestrial estimates of viscosities and flow rates tend to fa
ll closer to known terrestrial measurements and estimates of channel flow t
han to previous planetary estimates. We therefore suggest that the analytic
Newtonian rectangular channel flow model is a more appropriate physical mo
del for many channeled terrestrial and planetary flows than the Newtonian i
nfinite sheet flow and approximation to Bingham channel flow widely used pr
eviously.