Encephalitis virus persistence in California birds: Preliminary studies with house finches

Citation
Wk. Reisen et al., Encephalitis virus persistence in California birds: Preliminary studies with house finches, J MED ENT, 38(3), 2001, pp. 393-399
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Entomology/Pest Control
Journal title
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ENTOMOLOGY
ISSN journal
00222585 → ACNP
Volume
38
Issue
3
Year of publication
2001
Pages
393 - 399
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-2585(200105)38:3<393:EVPICB>2.0.ZU;2-9
Abstract
Field-collected house finches of mixed sex and age were infected experiment ally with either western equine encephalomyelitis (WEE) or St. Louis enceph alitis (SLE) viruses during the summer or fall of 1998 and maintained over the winter under ambient conditions. To detect natural relapse during the s pring, 32 birds were bled weekly from February through June 1999, and then necropsied 1 yr after infection to detect chronic infections using a revers e transcription polymerase chain reaction IRT-PCR). After 10 mo, 13/14 surv iving birds previously infected with WEE were antibody positive by enzyme i mmunoassay (EIA), and 11/14 had plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) antibody titers >1:20, whereas only of 8/13 birds previously infected with SLE were positive by EIA and all had PRNT titers <1:20. When necropsied. 1 /14 and 1/13 birds had WEE and SLE RT-PCR positive lung or spleen tissue, r espectively: blood, brain, and liver tissues were negative as were all prev ious blood samples. All tissues horn these birds including weekly blood sam ples tested negative for infectious virus by plaque assay on Vero cell cult ure. To determine if persistent antibody was protective. birds infected ini tially with WEE or SLE in November 1998 were challenged 6 mo later with hom ologous virus. WEE antibody persisted well (5/6 birds remained PRNT positiv e before challenge) and remained protective. because 0/6 birds were viremic after challenge. In contrast. SLE antibody decayed rapidly (0/6 birds rema ined PRNTT positive before challenge) and was not protective. because 3/6 b irds developed an ephemeral viremia on day 1 after infection (mean titer, 1 0(273) plaque forming units/0.1 ml). When necropsied 7 wk after challenge, 1/10 birds infected with WEE and 1/10 birds infected with SLE exhibited an RT-PCR positive spleen, despite the fact that both birds had PRNT antibody titers >1:10 at this time. To determine if immunosuppression would cause a chronic infection to relapse, eight birds initially infected with either WE E or SLE were treated with cyclophosphamide and then tested repeatedly for viremia: all samples were negative For virus by plaque assay. Collectively, our results indicated that a low percentage of birds experimentally infect ed with WEE or SLE developed chronic infections in the spleen or lung that could be detected by RT-PCR, but not by plaque assay. Birds did not appear to relapse naturally or after immunosuppression. The rapid decay of SLE, bu t not WEE. antibody may allow the relapse of chronic infections of SLE, but not WEE, to produce viremias sufficiently elevated to infect mosquitoes.