Results from 10 years of breast screening in Wales

Citation
H. Fielder et al., Results from 10 years of breast screening in Wales, J MED SCREE, 8(1), 2001, pp. 21-23
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Envirnomentale Medicine & Public Health
Journal title
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING
ISSN journal
09691413 → ACNP
Volume
8
Issue
1
Year of publication
2001
Pages
21 - 23
Database
ISI
SICI code
0969-1413(2001)8:1<21:RF1YOB>2.0.ZU;2-D
Abstract
Objective-To present results from 10 years of breast screening in Wales, in cluding rates of interval cancers. Setting-All women aged 50-64 years in Wales; approximately 250 000 in each screening round. Methods-Breast Test Wales (BTW) began mammographic screening in 1989 as par t of the National Breast Screening Programme. Two view mammography was intr oduced at the inception of the Welsh programme for all prevalent screens. S ingle view mammography was subsequently performed for incident screens. Int erval cancers were identified by matching details from the BTW administrati ve screening database with the BTW database of all incident breast cancers for residents in Wales. Results-For the first and second round prevalent screens, the cancer detect ion rate was 8.6 per 1000 and 7.4 per 1000 screened, respectively. The inte rval cancer rates following round one were 4.9 per 10 000 in the first 12 m onths, 9.0 per 10 000 between 12 and 24 months, and 11.6 per 10 000 between 24 and 36 months after screening. For the second round incident screens th e detection rate was 4.6 per 1000 and the standardised detection ratio was 0.89, but the interval cancer rates in the first year after incident screen s were not statistically different from those following prevalent screens. There was no change in the proportion of invasive breast cancers which were < 15 mm in diameter, or in the grades of invasive cancer between the first and second rounds, prevalent or incident screens. Conclusions-Breast Test Wales has achieved the standards set by the Nationa l Health Service Breast Screening Programme. Taking two views at the preval ent screen gave high sensitivity and may have resulted in the low standardi sed detection ratio at subsequent incident screens.