S. Kheradmandan et al., Fracture strength of four different types of anterior 3-unit bridges afterthermo-mechanical fatigue in the dual-axis chewing simulator, J ORAL REH, 28(4), 2001, pp. 361-369
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fracture strength of four dif
ferent types of anterior 3-unit bridges after thermo-mechanical fatigue in
a dual-axis chewing simulator. Sixty-four human maxillary incisors were pre
pared and 32 bridges fabricated. The four groups of eight bridges each were
- (GC): AGC(R) galvano-ceramic bridges (CA): Celay(R) In-Ceram(R) Alumina
bridges (E2): heat-pressed lithium disilicate glass-ceramic bridges and (CM
) ceramo-metal (control). Fracture loads were recorded after a dual-axis ch
ewing simulator and in a universal testing machine. The survival rate after
5 years for the CM and the GC groups was 100%, for the E2 group 75% and fo
r the CA group 37.5% (Kaplan-Mayer analysis). The mean fracture strengths (
N) were 681.52 +/- 151.90 (CM); 397.71 +/- 59.02 (GC); 292.92 +/- 46.45 (E2
) and 239.95 +/- 33.39 (CA), respectively. The log-rank test showed a signi
ficant difference between the CA and the GC or the CA and the CM groups. No
significant differences between the E2 and the CA or the E2 and the GC gro
ups were found. The study indicates that heat-pressed lithium disilicate gl
ass-ceramic and AGC(R) galvano-ceramic bridges are alternatives to ceramo-m
etal 3-unit anterior bridges.